A seafarer still undergoing medical treatment beyond the 120/ 240 day period despite an assessment
from the company designated physician is entitled to total and permanent
disability benefits.
This principle was reiterated by the Supreme Court in the
case of Dario Carcedo v. Maine Marine Philippines, Inc./ Misuga Kajun
Co., Ltd (G.R. No. 203804, April 15, 2015).
The seafarer’s foot was wounded because of his safety shoes while on board the vessel.
Despite medication, his foot’s
condition worsened when he slid down the deck and bumped his right foot. He
felt pain in the back of his swollen leg and developed fever and headache.
When he was treated at a Japanese hospital, the
doctor diagnosed the seafarer with an
open fracture of the right major toe bone with a suspicion of sepsis.
Upon his repatriation in the Philippines, the seafarer initially underwent debridement ( surgical removal of contaminated tissue) of the wound of the right big toe. The toe was later amputated.
Upon his repatriation in the Philippines, the seafarer initially underwent debridement ( surgical removal of contaminated tissue) of the wound of the right big toe. The toe was later amputated.
On March 24, 2009, the company doctor recommended “an
impediment disability grading of 8% for Loss of first toe (big toe) and
some of its metatarsal bone”.
Due to infection of the
amputated stump, the seafarer was again
admitted to the hospital where the right first metatarsal bone was removed.
The seafarer’s personal doctor noted that the absence
of the first and second toe which caused him to walk on the lateral aspect of
his left foot with a cane. He had
some pain on weight bearing.
The Supreme Court said the
schedule of disabilities in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA), if there
is one, or the POEA standard employment contract , should be the primary basis
for the determination of a seafarer’s degree of disability.
However, the POEA contract and the CBA cannot be read in isolation from
the Labor Code and the Amended Rules on Employee Compensation (AREC) .
Otherwise, the disability rating of the seafarer will be completely at the
mercy of the company-designated physician, without redress, should the latter
fail or refuse to give one.
The Supreme Court said that
the that the 24 March 2009 disability assessment made by the company doctor was not
definitive. The said disability assessment was merely an interim one because the seafarer continued to require medical treatments even
after 24 March 2009.
He was confined in the
hospital from 20 April 2009 to 6 June 2009, where he underwent serial
debridements, curettage, sequestrectomy and even amputation of the right first
metatarsal bone.
Since the seafarer required further medical treatments beyond the 120 day period, his total and temporary disability was extended.
The company-designated
physician then had until 240 days from repatriation to give the final
assessment.
However, the company-designated physician failed to give a definitive impediment rating of the seafarer’s disability beyond the extended temporary disability period, after the 120-day period but less than 240 days.
However, the company-designated physician failed to give a definitive impediment rating of the seafarer’s disability beyond the extended temporary disability period, after the 120-day period but less than 240 days.
Neither was there a
certification from the company-designated physician as to the seafarer’s
fitness for sea service. And
even if it had, it would be belied by his subsequent reports on, and the fact
of, the continuation of medical treatments and hospitalization of the seafarer
after the issuance of the 24 March 2009 report
By operation of law, the
seafarer’s total and temporary disability lapsed into a total and permanent
disability.
It is not the injury which is
compensated, but rather it is the incapacity to work resulting in the
impairment of one’s earning capacity.
Permanent total disability
means disablement to earn wages in the same kind of work, or work of
similar nature that he was trained for or accustomed to perform, or any kind of
work which a person of his mentality and attainment could do. It does not
mean absolute helplessness.
Atty. Dennis R. Gorecho heads
the seafarers’ division of the Sapalo Velez Bundang Bulilan law offices. For
comments, email info@sapalovelez.com, or call 09175025808 or
09088665786).
No comments:
Post a Comment